Research Paper Examines Explainability of SOC Operator Decisions During Real-World Security Alarm Triaging Processes

The research published on arXiv explores the interpretability and accountability of human analysts working within Security Operations Centers. It specifically evaluates whether operators can provide coherent and actionable explanations for their decisions to escalate or dismiss security alarms. This study is particularly relevant as organizations increasingly rely on a mix of manual triaging and automated AI agents to handle high volumes of telemetry data. Findings suggest that as system complexity increases, the ability of human operators to articulate the specific reasons for their triage choices often diminishes. This lack of transparency can lead to inconsistencies in threat detection and complicates the auditing process. Security engineers should consider how these findings impact the reliability of the training data used for internal security models. To mitigate these risks, the paper highlights the importance of implementing structured reporting frameworks. These frameworks ensure that human intuition is translated into documented logic, which is essential for refining automated detection rules and maintaining a robust security posture. Organizations are encouraged to review their current incident response protocols to ensure that analyst rationale is captured consistently across all triage stages.